Comparative study on steam flash, organic flash and Kalina for enhanced power generation from waste heat recovery
Abstract
A huge amount of waste hot gases from cement factories are available for power generation. The current work is focusedon enhancing the power from the hot gas with proper power augmentation and selection of technology. The selection ofpower plant and working fluid influences the output from waste heat recovery. In the current work, three power plants areconsidered at low temperature heat recovery (LTHR) and five power plants are considered at intermediate temperature heatrecovery (ITHR). Organic Rankine cycle (ORC), organic flash cycle (OFC), Kalina cycle system (KCS) are studied at LTHRand ITHR and steam Rankine cycle (SRC) and steam flash cycle (SFC) are studied at ITHR. R124 and ammonia are selectedrespectively at LTHR and ITHR organic cycles (ORC and OFC). Following a comparative study, OFC is recommended forLTHR and KCS is recommended for ITHR on the basis of maximum power generation.References
[1] A Tica, H Gueguen, D Dumur, D Faille, F, Davelaar, 2012. Design of a combined cycle power plant model for optimization, Applied Energy 98, 256–265.
[2] S Cafaro., L.Napoli, A.Traverso, A.F.Massardo, 2010. Monitoring of the thermoeconomic performance in an actual combined cycle power plant bottoming cycle, Energy 35, 902–910.
[3] T.Srinivas, A.V.S.S.K.S.Gupta, B.V. Reddy, 2008. Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of multi-pressure heat recovery steam generator in combined power cycle. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 67(10), 827-834.
[4] J Wang, Dai Yiping, L.Gao, 2009. Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry. Applied Energy, 86(6), 941-948.
[5] T Ho, SS.Mao, R Greif, 2012. Comparison of the Organic Flash Cycle (OFC) to other advanced vapor cycles for intermediate and high temperature waste heat reclamation and solar thermal energy, Energy 42, 213-223.
[6] G.V.Pradeep Varma, T. Srinivas, 2015. Design and analysis of a cogeneration plant using heat recovery of a cement factory, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 5, 24-31.
[7] R.Chacartegui, D.Sánchez, J.M.Muñoz, T. Sánchez, 2009. Alternative ORC bottoming cycles for combined cycle power plants, Applied Energy 86, 2162–2170.
[8] S Quoilin, S Declaye, BF Tchanche, V Lemort, 2011. Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles, Applied Thermal Engineering 31, 2885-2893.
[9] J Wang, Z Yan, M Wang, S Maa, Y Dai, 2013. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an (organic Rankine cycle) ORC using low grade heat source, Energy 49, 356-365.
[10] H Rosyid, R.Koestoer, N.Putra, Nasruddin, AA Mohamad, Yanuar, 2010. Sensitivity analysis of steam power plant-binary cycle, Energy 35, 3578-3586.
[11] J Sarkar, S Bhattacharyya, 2015. Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study, 90(2), 1618–1625.
[12] F Heberle, M Preibinger, D Brüggemann, 2012. Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources, Renewable Energy 37, 364-370.
[13] J Hua, Y Chen, J Wu, Z Zhi, C Dong, 2015. Waste heat supply-side power regulation with variable concentration for turbine in Kalina cycle, Applied Thermal Engineering 91, 583-590.
[14] S.Li, Y.Dai, 2014. Thermo-economic comparison of Kalina and CO2 transcritical power cycle for low temperature geothermal sources in ChinaApplied Thermal Engineering 70, 139-152.
[15] J. Kotowicz, M. Job, Ł. Bartela, M. Brze˛czek, A. Skorek-Osikowska, Utilization of heat recovered from compressed gases in an oxy-combustion power unit to power the Organic Rankine Cycle module, Journal of Power Technologies 95 (4) (2015) 239–249.
[16] N.Shankar Ganesh, T.Srinivas, 2012. Design and modeling of low temperature solar thermal power station”. Applied Energy 91(1), pp. 180-186.
[17] N.Shankar Ganesh, T.Srinivas, 2013. Power augmentation in a Kalina power station for medium temperature low grade heat, ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 135(3), 1-10.
[2] S Cafaro., L.Napoli, A.Traverso, A.F.Massardo, 2010. Monitoring of the thermoeconomic performance in an actual combined cycle power plant bottoming cycle, Energy 35, 902–910.
[3] T.Srinivas, A.V.S.S.K.S.Gupta, B.V. Reddy, 2008. Thermodynamic modeling and optimization of multi-pressure heat recovery steam generator in combined power cycle. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 67(10), 827-834.
[4] J Wang, Dai Yiping, L.Gao, 2009. Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry. Applied Energy, 86(6), 941-948.
[5] T Ho, SS.Mao, R Greif, 2012. Comparison of the Organic Flash Cycle (OFC) to other advanced vapor cycles for intermediate and high temperature waste heat reclamation and solar thermal energy, Energy 42, 213-223.
[6] G.V.Pradeep Varma, T. Srinivas, 2015. Design and analysis of a cogeneration plant using heat recovery of a cement factory, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 5, 24-31.
[7] R.Chacartegui, D.Sánchez, J.M.Muñoz, T. Sánchez, 2009. Alternative ORC bottoming cycles for combined cycle power plants, Applied Energy 86, 2162–2170.
[8] S Quoilin, S Declaye, BF Tchanche, V Lemort, 2011. Thermo-economic optimization of waste heat recovery Organic Rankine Cycles, Applied Thermal Engineering 31, 2885-2893.
[9] J Wang, Z Yan, M Wang, S Maa, Y Dai, 2013. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an (organic Rankine cycle) ORC using low grade heat source, Energy 49, 356-365.
[10] H Rosyid, R.Koestoer, N.Putra, Nasruddin, AA Mohamad, Yanuar, 2010. Sensitivity analysis of steam power plant-binary cycle, Energy 35, 3578-3586.
[11] J Sarkar, S Bhattacharyya, 2015. Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study, 90(2), 1618–1625.
[12] F Heberle, M Preibinger, D Brüggemann, 2012. Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources, Renewable Energy 37, 364-370.
[13] J Hua, Y Chen, J Wu, Z Zhi, C Dong, 2015. Waste heat supply-side power regulation with variable concentration for turbine in Kalina cycle, Applied Thermal Engineering 91, 583-590.
[14] S.Li, Y.Dai, 2014. Thermo-economic comparison of Kalina and CO2 transcritical power cycle for low temperature geothermal sources in ChinaApplied Thermal Engineering 70, 139-152.
[15] J. Kotowicz, M. Job, Ł. Bartela, M. Brze˛czek, A. Skorek-Osikowska, Utilization of heat recovered from compressed gases in an oxy-combustion power unit to power the Organic Rankine Cycle module, Journal of Power Technologies 95 (4) (2015) 239–249.
[16] N.Shankar Ganesh, T.Srinivas, 2012. Design and modeling of low temperature solar thermal power station”. Applied Energy 91(1), pp. 180-186.
[17] N.Shankar Ganesh, T.Srinivas, 2013. Power augmentation in a Kalina power station for medium temperature low grade heat, ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 135(3), 1-10.
Published
2016-07-07
How to Cite
VARMA, G. V. Pradeep; SRINIVAS, T..
Comparative study on steam flash, organic flash and Kalina for enhanced power generation from waste heat recovery.
Journal of Power Technologies, [S.l.], v. 96, n. 2, p. 81--91, july 2016.
ISSN 2083-4195.
Available at: <https://papers.itc.pw.edu.pl/index.php/JPT/article/view/805>. Date accessed: 26 dec. 2024.
Issue
Section
Energy Conversion and Storage
Keywords
energy; efficiency; flash cycle; heat recovery; Kalina
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
