Economic Viability of Battery Energy Storage for the Provision of Frequency Regulation Service

  • Christos Yianni University of Cyprus
  • Venizelos Efthymiou University of Cyprus
  • George E. Georghiou University of Cyprus


Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) can provide a number of services to the power grid, with various financial potentials.This paper examines the economic viability of BESS providing primary frequency regulation (PFR) services in Europeanmarkets. The current status of frequency regulation markets of mainland UK (Great Britain) and Central Europe was investigatedand a techno-econometric model was developed to examine the economic viability and profitability of each marketcase. The results show a positive Net Present Value (NPV) for all the examined markets and a high internal rate of return(IRR). The impact of the most influential parameters such as service price and initial capital cost has been examined andanalysed. This analysis seeks to inform interested parties about the viability of BESS services and to provide guidelines forfuture development.


[1] G. Fitzgerald, J. Mandel, J. Morris, H. Touati, The economics of battery
energy storage: How multi-use, customer-sited batteries deliver the
most services and value to customers and the grid, Rocky Mountain
Figure 3: NPV at years 5, 10 and 15 as a function of initial CAPEX of the
[2] C. Pieper, H. Rubel, Revisiting energy storage: there is a business
case, The Boston Consulting Group (02).
[3] V. Pandurangan, H. Zareipour, O. Malik, Frequency regulation services:
A comparative study of select north american and european reserve
markets, in: North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2012,
IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–8.
[4] D. Greenwood, K. Y. Lim, C. Patsios, P. Lyons, Y. S. Lim, P. Taylor, Frequency
response services designed for energy storage, Applied Energy
203 (2017) 115–127.
[5] U. Energy, Ancillary services report 2017, Available online
at:[Accessed 22 July 2017].
[6] E. Ares, G. Grimwood, Energy Storage in the UK, House Commons
Libr., no. 07621, p.32, 2016.
[7] “enhanced frequency response (efr) national grid uk.” [online].
[8] “ internetplattform zur vergabe von regelleistung.” [online].
available: [accessed:
[9] “net present value - npv,” 2017. [online]. available: [accessed: 21-oct-
[10] C. yianni, m. florides, s. afxentis, v. efthymiou, and g. e. georghiou,
“economic viability of battery energy storage system applications,”
2018 ieee int. energy conf. energycon 2018, pp. 1–6, 2018.
[11] F. Cell, H. J. Undertaking, Commercialisation of energy storage in europe,
Final Report (2015) 52.
[12] Lazard, “lazard’s levelised cost of storage v3.0,” november 2017.
[13] “energy storage & battery technology,” no. march, pp. 1–5, 2017, sandbag.
[14] B. Lee, M. Lapides, P. Archambault, I. Matsubashi, R. Koort,
M. Sugiyama, The great battery race framing the next frontier in clean
technology-electrical energy storage, Goldman Sachs.
[15] I. Pawel, The cost of storage–how to calculate the levelized cost of
stored energy (lcoe) and applications to renewable energy generation,
Energy Procedia 46 (2014) 68–77.
[16] J. Neubauer, M. Simpson, Deployment of behind-the-meter energy
storage for demand charge reduction, National Renewable Energy
Laboratory Golden, CO, 2015.
How to Cite
YIANNI, Christos; EFTHYMIOU, Venizelos; GEORGHIOU, George E.. Economic Viability of Battery Energy Storage for the Provision of Frequency Regulation Service. Journal of Power Technologies, [S.l.], v. 98, n. 5, p. 403–407, feb. 2019. ISSN 2083-4195. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 05 aug. 2021.


battery energy storage, primary frequency regulation, economic viability

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.